whecosmetics.blogg.se

Ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii
Ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii











If others can make it work for them, more power to them, I can't. the PC which was perfectly smooth as you would expect with 18 layers. When playing I found huge jumps in timbre and dynamics vs. On the iPad, it's something like five trying to cover the same range. The Ivory Steinway covers a wide dynamic and timbral range. There's also a huge difference in the playability. Seems like it's going to be all over the place. As most people run these iPad synths/instruments in standalone mode, it's up to each developer to properly account for latency and jitter. It got me thinking that MIDI jitter might be as big an issue as latency. 64 on the iPad, it was CLEARLY more responsive and consistent. Not everyone is willing to invest that kind of money in a VST instrument. I agree that the first four VSTs are very good, but they are also quite expensive. The Ivory II grand pianos are also often praised by piano enthusiasts. Even though I was at 128 sample buffer on the Windows machine vs. The Ravenscroft 275 and the Addictive Keys Studio Grands VSTs. I went back and compared Ivory Steinway running on my Windows 10 PC in Pro Tools vs. Even so, I still find Module pleasing to the ears and seems to fit nicely in a mix.perhaps best at a moderate to slow tempo. Got to say it again, Jazz+ is totally right. However the vintage upright and the white upright seem to do pretty well for me and only take moderate effort to stay on point with them.Īfter a couple of hours in iOS land, I found myself actually rushing the beat once back on the internal pianos in the Numa Compact2. Ravenscroft seemed to have the easiest groove of my iOS AP's, even though its quickest buffer setting is only 256 (5.6 m-sec, I think).Ĭolossus is kind of a niche sound and some of the smaller sized models have way bad latency. I constantly find myself quite behind the beat on anything quicker than 184 bpm with Module.

ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii

Something about the Korg makes it rather challenging to stay in the pocket, especially on a fast jump-swing blues.

ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii

Jazz+ is totally correct with his observation. Every detail has been painstakingly crafted to bring you the most authentic piano experience ever on iOS.I must eat my buffering words after a few days A-B-C & D-ing several piano apps and a couple of internal Numa Compact 2's. The final result delivers crystal clear hammer attacks, staccato release trails, and much more. The same quest for the highest fidelity sounds has spurred the deep sampling and meticulous capturing of this piano for the app. The origins of this virtual instrument lie in the masterfully crafted Ravenscroft 275 Titanium Grand Piano - made of 1,000 year old sitka spruce wood with solid titanium string termination points and precise, responsive CAD optimized action.

ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii

Launch the app and access the gorgeous tone of this one-of-a-kind concert grand from your iPhone or iPad.

ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii

Experience the splendor of a Ravenscroft Grand with the most realistic sounding piano ever created for iOS.













Ravenscroft 275 vs ivory ii